Learning Matters!

May 5, 2008

Training Leadership Summit Workshop Summary

null

Yesterday I deliverd a one day workshop to 20 learning leaders at the beautiful Rancho Bernardo resort in San Diego. This was a great turnout given that this conference caters to high level decision makers in enterprise learning. The attendees were very enthused about the possibilities that Virtual Worlds can provide to help change the game in learning. Much of our afternoon discussion centered around how to overcome barriers to adoption, whether to leverage open-source, public or private worlds and how much it would cost to implement a virtual world platform behind the firewall.

I am very encouraged that the dialogue amond learning leaders has progressed over the past year from “Should we consider this” to “How do we do this.” By the time Training 09 rolls around I predict we’ll have more than 50 people in the 3Di workshop.

Lorri Freifeld (Executive Editor of Training Magazine) asked me to write a short piece on 3Di for confernece participants.

Here is what I came up with:

Join the Webvolution: The Internet has forever changed Business, can Learning be far Behind

Market economies typically are characterized by extended periods of stability occasionally punctuated by short unstable periods that forever alter the economic landscape. In the past, disruptive technologies such as the printing press and the steam engine were catalysts in redefining the economies of their respective eras. In the information-age economy, the Internet has emerged as the primary disruptive force of our time—driving unpredictable changes in our economy while simultaneously challenging the viability of the 20th century enterprise.

Today, we live in an innovation-focused, knowledge-enabled economy where work is increasing rapidly in complexity and velocity. Computers have migrated from being information crunchers focused on optimizing productivity to people connectors focused on creating economic value through human interaction. In this increasingly flat, transparent, and globally interconnected world, organizations or individuals that cannot change as fast as the environment within which they operate are destined to regress to a mean of mediocrity.

Internet technology makes rich exchanges possible without the need for formal structures. The nonlinear dynamics of this new information ecosystem are challenging the traditional structures of enterprise. In fact, a recent study from IBM’s Global Innovation Outlook suggests that the future might consist of a billion one-person enterprises—people who act as free agents moving freely and frequently from project to project as their skills, focus, and passion shift.
Today, people work, communicate, and learn across time zones and physical boundaries. Information no longer moves in one direction from top to bottom or from teacher to learner. Instead, information has a social life all its own. It moves through time and space based on the desire and ability of individuals to interact with it—and with each other—to make more effective decisions or develop keener insights. In the Webvolution era, information is the currency, individuals are the transport mechanism, and conversation is the transfer mechanism.
As Webvolution unfolds, the scarcity paradigm that undergirds most modern economic theory is reversed. Information is a non-appropriable resource. It can be shared without being given away.

If we take a positive perspective, we can conceive of the Internet as a living information ecosystem, whose central purpose is to promote learning and growth. In essence, people become part of the information infrastructure. They are represented as nodes in a pervasive and persistent network that is aware of who they are; what they are capable of doing; and, perhaps more important, what they are keenly interested in doing. Within this context, the Internet itself can be conceived of as a persistent, worldwide community of learners. Mark Zukerberg, the 23-year-old CEO of social networking juggernaut Facebook puts it this way: “The other guys think communication is a way to get information. We think information is a way to foster better communication between people.”

In this type of information ecosystem the very concept of learning must be recast. Jay Cross puts it best this way: “Schooling has confused us into thinking learning was equivalent to pouring content into people’s heads. It’s more practical to think of learning as optimizing our networks.” Optimized human intuition networks create a meaningful context within which content can be consumed and digested to create new value.

In the Webvolution era, content may be king, but context is the kingdom. The enterprise that is able to network and tap into resource nodes to address a surfaced need within another part of the network will be able to successfully conduct business within a system primarily tuned to optimize learning and growth.

How would our concept of learning in organizations change if we began to view ourselves as facilitators of generative learning in which the full collaborative might of the Internet is wielded to build relationships and foster innovation among people within and across the enterprise?

To achieve this vision, the learning function’s focus and value proposition must migrate from supporting denominator management (i.e., teaching people how to do things we know how to do to cut costs), to driving numerator growth (i.e., enabling human capital to develop ideas and concepts that grow revenue). Unfortunately, learning that is innovation focused has a very different form factor and theoretical underpinning from learning that is productivity focused. Innovation-focused learning is generative and socially constructed. It feeds on context and social interaction to channel human intuition toward rapid collective sensemaking around a given opportunity or issue.

In the enterprise of the future, work and learning become synonymous. Without the ability to innovate and adapt on an ongoing basis, enterprises simply disappear. At the heart of the capacity to innovate is the ability to learn. An enterprise simply cannot innovate or adapt without first learning something new. The flat world economy requires a new vision for learning: one in which individuals and organizations fundamentally change the way they talk about, work with, and act on what is known and what needs to be known in order to adapt, survive, and thrive.

As leaders of the learning profession, we have not taken the time to ponder the profound effects that Webvolution will have on our work in service of the pressing innovation agenda. We quickly must begin to focus on how to leverage the participatory Web to unleash the latent innovative energy that lies dormant within the existing structure of enterprise.

Consequently, the primary challenge for learning leadership over the next few years will be to fundamentally recreate the function to drive the innovation agenda without falling prey to the routinization trap. Attempting to address the innovation agenda with more efficient productivity-focused training strategies and technologies is akin to attempting to play tennis with a golf club. The tool is not suited to the reality of the challenge at hand and must be avoided at all costs.

A bright future depends on bright people. The ability to allow the enterprise to coalesce capability around market opportunity is the pre-eminent challenge for the learning function in the 21st century. Often, past successes instantiate core rigidities that hamper future transformation and growth. In our case, forgetting those strategies and approaches that have served our function well up to this point may be the key to ensuring we are successful in meeting this new challenge.

May 4, 2008

Advanced Learning Technologies Summit

http://wadatripp.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/alta.jpg

On May 13 and 14 of next week I have the distinct honor of MC’ing what I believe is the first real enterprise grade summit on the application of advanced learning technologies to learning.

The good news is that the Virtual Worlds folks are planning BOTH and Enterprise and Education track for their conference in September so we are gaining traction, but for right now this is the ONLY place to be when it comes to enterprise applications.

There is a great line of up of speakers and panelists and the focus and emphasis is on what has been DONE and what has been learned from those who have blazed the Trail. The Research Triangle Park is a hotbed for 3D technologies and participants will get to see first hand how technologies are being applied for business benefit.

Hope to see y’all there. Check out the lineup here. I think you will agree this is one you won’t want to miss ; )

April 17, 2008

HRPS Conference Presentation Summary

Earlier this week I had the opportunity to particpate with colleagues from IBM and Duke CE in a plenary session at the HRPS Conference

Our session was entitled “Second Life: What’s the Business Case for HR in the Virtual World?” My buddy Steve Mahaley (Ace Carson in SL) did an awesome job of producing this plenary. And boy was it ever a production! We had two large screens. One was projecting SL the other was projecting charts. We had an elaborate script and had to manage timing with Chuck Hamilton from IBM who was dialled in on SL from Vancouver.

We kicked it off with a fun video (Rip, Remix, Reload rules in effect here) where the idea was to present SL as a frivolous place that is the domain of 17 year old pimply faced males…check it out:

We then went through the Platform, the Industry Applications at IBM that dealth with HR (Recruiting, Call Centers, Intern Training, Onboarding, Alumni etc, etc, etc by taking a virtual tour with Chuck. We ended the session with a Video that summarized all the applications we had covered. Check it out:

We ended with a very healthy and pragmatic Q&A from the audience of HR Decision Makers and we got a lot of positive feedback after the session. All in all it was a great conference and I think we got these senior folks thinking about the opportunities that the first-person interface can provide to their increasingly important function.

April 16, 2008

One Year In: Hokies Stay Strong

Thirteen years and one day ago my wife and I were married at Virginia Tech chapel. I sent her a 12 red and one white rose yesterday to recognize our special day. One year ago today, our world was rocked by the news from Virginia Tech. From here on out we are destined to carry the joy of our union and the pain of the Hokie Nation within the span of 24 hours.

I think we all should take some time to reflect on how lucky we are to be alive. My own catharsis is captured in my post to the Hokie Nation a year ago. You can read it here.

Perhaps the rest of us could take 3 minutes and truly be present with this You Tube:

Stay Strong Hokie Nation.

April 4, 2008

The i-web Singularity Redux

Virtual Worlds III is in full swing up in New York and around the blogosphere. The big news is that IBM announces a development deal with Second Life to bring their platform to the enterprise. This is yet one more piece of the puzzle that falls into place for a vision for what I am calling the i-web singularity: A technological black hole at the apex of four technological vectors that is moving forward at an exponential pace and integrating across vectors at the same time.

I have noodled on this topic before, but this time I think the focus is getting sharper.

Vector 1: Flatland 2D Learning applications integrate with Knowledge sharing repositories. The outcome here is that truly NETWORKed Virtual Spaces emerge. These spaces will integrate Synchronous Sharing with Asynchronous Storage so there is finally a one stop shop for storage and sharing of content. Since MS owns Sharepoint and Live Meeting they could create a slam dunk in this arena. Cisco bought Webex for 3.2Billion dollars (Austin Powers comes to mind) recently so they must be looking for some kind of value-added play here too and I know that know that my students would love nothing more than more jumping back and between Illuminante to Vista (Blackboard) and Yahoo Groups to get their work done.

Vector 2: Web 2.0 meets Knoweldge Sharing Spaces. I won’t go over well trodden ground on how Blogs, Wikis and Social Media sites like Facebook and Myspace are revolutionizing real-time interactive KM concepts. However, the true transformation lever in the Web 2.0 revolution for me is is the one least discussed: Tagging/Folksonomy. Pretty much everyting created and stored in the Web 2.0 domain (people,profiles and content) is TAGGED. This means that contextually relevant knoweldeg through people or content is much more easily or even serendipitously encountered. More tagging means more knowledge accidents of both the people-to-people and people-to-information kind. In the attention economy, information is the currency, people are the transport mechanism and conversation is the transfer mechanism. The mash-up between real-time tagging and NETWORKed Virtual spaces will jack up knowledge accidents and drive the immediacy of access to key information and interaction with key people around a given task or activity. In this emerging virtually afforded, contextually relevant matchmaking world, knowledge discovery and expert encounters becomes like air, it just happens and people don’t give it a second thought.

Vector 3: The 212 degree point for for both Trend 1 and 2 is when the web enters the next dimension, literally. With the infusion of 3Di technology, it is only a matter of time before 3D Social Networking taking off. The 3Di space is a different kind of cottage industry. It is the first one I have encountered that is run on blogs. The time between idea and actualization is tending towards zero. Case in point, at Virtual Worlds II in Christian Renaud’s Keynote introduction Ruben Steiger predicted that one of the key Social Networking sites (Facebook or Myspace) would go 3D in 2008. Later that SAME AFTERNOON the Active Worlds booth was demoing a 3D Facebook page mash-up that someone had sent them. When you think about it it just plain makes sense. Look at MySpace. They will truly become MySPACE (and not MyPAGE as it is today) and actualize their brand promise by integrating 3D technology. It is just too obvious an outcome for it not to happen. This social movement will, in turn - like its more stripped down relative instant messaging - will then force corporate CIOs to develop enterprise grade 3D Facebook/Myspace mash-ups for their for corporate citizens. Forterra is already playing with integrating sametime into their platform and Proton Media already has enterprise grade 3D Myspace built into its archtecture. So from both the consumer, enterprise and vendor side of the equation we are seeing convergence here.

Vector 4: Last , but by no means least we see how Synchronous 2D learning platforms will enter the third dimension. As is the case with social media, it just plain makes sense that flatland distance learning systems like Webex, Adobe, Citrix and Illuminate will be pulled into the 3D realm, particularly given the activity in the other four vectors. Karl Kapp and I have written extensively on this and I have a summary of our notion of learning applicaitons escaping flatland here.

These four vectors are on a collision to creat the i-web: Immersive, Interactive, Immediate and Intuitive. When this world-wide, three-dimensional, avatar-mediated Cognosphere emerges we will truly reach a singularity: a point where technological progress reaches infinity as it relates to leveraging and enabling human capital.

The i-web will become a worldwide virtual platform that allows people to exercise their skills and abilities passion around endeavors that matter most to them (and get paid for it too). The i-web will be like e-bay for trading work rather than second-hand products. No one will work for the i-web. Instead the i-web will work for them. Providing i-web dwellers the opportunity to find both work and people to work with on endeavors that they share a passion around. e-Bay allowed people to sell their personal items in a world-wide yard sale, the i-web will allow people to sell their personal skills and abilities in much the same way.

Free agent nation - nay virtual planet - here we come! If you think the i-phone was cool, wait until the i-web consumes us (or our avatars).

Here is the 2minute 30 second romp through the model on YouTube:

March 17, 2008

Thoughts (OK Rant) on this Month’s Big Question

Filed under: Big Question, Infoglut, informal learning, learning, wada — wadatripp @ 9:16 pm

A colleague of mine, Michael Carter, has a great rule. Any time he hears someone’s name more than three times in the space of a week he immediately picks up the phone and calls that person. I have always enjoyed the sporadic calls from Michael where he lets me know where my name popped up and what prompted his call.

In a strange way, a very similar meme is prompting me to write about this month’s big question. A few days ago I was asked to put in my .02 on the age-old debate on informal learning for a piece in CLO magazine. Then I see that Tony K and Karl brought this topic up as this month’s Big Question. Finally, today I was on a call with Andrew Paradise from ASTD Research today as they are gearing up for a new survey on - you guessed it - informal learning ; )

I many ways, my position (or commiseration) with respect to informal learning has not changed since the last go round on this subject. Only this time, I am a bit more fed up with our profession’s Ivory Tower approach. What is our RESPONSIBILITY for supporting the long tail in learning? Pause for a moment to examine our own language people! What was the buggy whip manufacturer’s responsibility for supporting the non-horse drawn carriage? Are we so self-absorbed in our own hubris that we actually believe we have a choice here. If so, how is it that we have become so deluded and how can we quickly pull our heads out of the sand?

To set the record straight, there is NOTHING informal about a person faced with the realization that they do not have the capability to engage in the very work activity that is required of them to satisfy their company or keep their job. And yet, here we sit in the Ivory Tower of our corporate schoolhouse, declaring the desperate efforts that these overworked and overstressed employees take upon themselves to learn what they can get the job done as being beneath us. Why? Because it is informal. Is it true that we are CHOOSING not to help these good folks because of semantics? If so, come on people! WAKE UP! If not, lets face our fears now and get on with our job of helping develop talent that drives sustainable competitive advantage for the organizaitons that we serve. Whether out of ignorance or fear, the time for inaction is over.

Are we so paralyzed by the classroom as THE only paradigm for learning that we have blinded ourselves to the very real possibility that, as Bill Joy would say, the future does not need us? Information in context is increasingly trumping instruction out of context and if we don’t wake up we are destined to go the way of the dinosaur.

Many of us have lamented how Google is our biggest competitor. This is because Google is often the only lifeline that these good folks have when the work environment surfaces a deficiency in their ability to add value or get their job done.

At least Google provides them with something. How does our profession respond to these teachable moments? Trick question or sad answer: We don’t. Why? Because we claim that the long-tail/informational tools that these desperate souls invoke to quell their survival anxiety is not our RESPONSIBILITY.

We have become increasingly addled by ADDIE, lured by LMSs, and enchanted by e-learning, all the while loosing sight of what matters most: The CLIENT. The poor sap out there in the infoglut feeling increasingly pressured by a world that is more confusing today than it was yesterday. The very same people who joined the company with the vigor and spark of a Supernova who have been now reduced to broken-down lumps of coal. What are we doing to help these poor people at their biggest moment of need?…… ANYONE? ….. I thought so. This is precisely what the client hears from us at their most acute moment of need. A big fat NOTHING. The sound of silence is worst at the greatest moment of need: That teachable moment where learning anxiety has finally trumped survival anxiety. And, our response is to remain silent. We are the king of mum precisely when our expertise is most needed by those that we are supposed to serve. Where is the sanity in this?

Instead of heeding the pleas of our clients, we sit in our Ivory Towers pondering whether or not we - the wonderfully talented learning professionals that we are - hould take RESPONSIBILITY for informal learning.

In another Big Question rant I have already discussed how the status-quo for formal learning is rapidly approaching extinction by painting itself into an increasingly irrelevant corner of our business. You can read that rant here.

In the meantime, I’d suggest we quickly get over ourselves and our hang ups about our responsibilities. We need to get back to basics and start focusing on what matters most: The CLIENT who desperately needs our help in figuring out to stay vital, vibrant and relevant in an increasingly uncertain world.

The glory days of learners as CAPTIVES in CLASSROOMS are over. The web has set them free. If we don’t start to take action soon it may be us who end up being captive to our own limiting paradigms as we continue to marginalize our value to the enterprise to the point of our own extinction.

Thanks for bringing this up Karl and Tony. I feel better now. Got all this off my chest yet again.
I wonder if it will make a lick of difference this time. It has not done so in the past.

The skeptic in me thinks not but I do feel better for having had the chance to vent. Long live the blogosphere ; )O

October 22, 2007

Escaping Flatland:Learning via the First-Person Interface

Filed under: Uncategorized — wadatripp @ 10:05 am

A while back Karl Kapp and I were asked by Steve Wexler of the e-Learing Guild to put or Fast-Forward hats on and describe what it will be like when Synchronous Learning meets 3D Avatar Mediated Interaction.

The result was a very long paper that was included in the Guild’s Report on Synchronous Learning that can be found here.

For those of you who attended the e-Learn conference and heard my keynote last week, you may want to check out this really cool video that Karl put together. It does a great job of getting across the key points we were trying to make.Thanks Karl!

Finally I enclose a copy of the chart that many folks asked for that attempts to summarize the emergent 3D Learning Archetype landscape that Karl and I envision as the relentless pace of technology marches on to infinity and beyond as Buzz Lightyear likes to say.

Looks like we are marching down that maturity curve already. Digital Avatars, in Digital Classrooms looking at Digital Presentations is so yesterday at this point ; ) Lets keep the progression going.

e-Learn Quebec Keynote

Filed under: Uncategorized — wadatripp @ 9:18 am
Tags: , ,

null

Last Friday, I had the honor of keynoting the e-Learn conference in Quebec City. My presentation can be found here.

Many of the attendees wanted to know if the videos I used were available online. As I mentioned in my talk, though I am a digital immigrant, I am trying very hard to swim uphill ; )

So here are the You Tube addresses for the videos:

Webvolution

Seven Sensibilities of Virtual Worlds

Virginia Tech Eulogy

Thanks to all who attended the keynote for your kind remarks and for the engaging Q&A session following the talk. I wish you all the best in realizing learning’s fullest potential within your respective organizations.

April 13, 2007

Enrichment of Experience….Must See TV errr Web Video

Filed under: Second Life, VSW Sensibilities, Virtual Worlds, aili mc connon — wadatripp @ 11:00 pm

I found out today that I get to chat with a Business Week reporter on Monday about 3Di.

Being a Web 2.0 kinda dude - and since I cant sleep anyway - I decided to see what I could find out about Aili McConnon before we got to talk next week. I do this all the time. The web is such a cool way to find a hook/meme or something in common between parties that quickly allows the synchronous connection to move to co-creation of insight.

My last post was about the power of Web 2.0. When I read the work (and watched the interviews) from Aili and her colleagues, I immediately sent it to two of my pals whom I knew would be very interested in their work.

Moreover, I now know so much more about where Aili is coming from our conversation will be all the richer. In this new world of information overload and attention defecit, Informaiton is the currency, people are the transport mechanism, conversation is the transfer mechanism and insight is the value exchange. As John Seely Brown so eloquently put it, Information does indeed have a social life and Web 2.0 just makes it happen faster. As Larry Prusak would say Knowledge Management is an oxymoron because you should not focus on managing “stocks” of information but instead we should be doing all we can enable its “flow” thereby creating knowlege accidents that generate value.

Also, because I think the research that Aili and her colleagues have done is so cool, I am so excited about the fact that we get to talk next week. This goes back to my notion that hardcore Web 2.0 people essentially become hardcore lifelong learners by default. The only adjustment here, for clarity, is that life-long learning is also every-moment learning in the Web 2.0 world.

Imagine a frictionless and distance-free environment powered by Web 2.0/Semantic Web/3Di that enables folks who are passionate about what they do to automagically connect with with people who have a need (i.e. willing to pay for) for exactly what those people are passionate about. This is the ultimate virtuous cycle. Could we really be on the cusp of something this big? Service Orient Architectures componentize social web services enable Mash Ups that make this value connection on an ongoing basis based on: where people are, what they are doing and the profile of who they are and what they like driving what is rendered up in that very same space.

Who knows? When I read SnowCrash 10 years ago after Dorothy Leonard Barton decreed at a PDMA conference that this is a book you must read… I said to myself “That is such a cool notion….too bad I’ll be dead when the Metaverse becomes a reality.”

Boy was I off-base on the time scale here. I did survive a 100-mile an hour head on collision in my early twenties…but barring that here I am at 40 spending more and more time in the Metaverse, and hopefully I have at least half my life still ahead of me. I won’t go back into Ruben Steiger’s funny story about his chat with Neal about Second Life being the Metaverse….but I will say that the arrival of the Metaverse within my own lifetime is a very welcome surprise.

Anyway, I digress (a byproduct of ADD).

Aili and her colleagues have a truly fascinating study that correlates with my own hypothesis that Avatar-Mediated Interaction enables an Enrichment of Experience. The creation of an experience that is not only near-real life or even augmented-virtual-reality but…plain-and-simply an experience that is different and than one you could ever experience in real life and by going through it you learn more about you own self and those around you.

All I can say is….check out Aili and her colleagues’ fine work for yourself. It is a great intro to SL in general…and more importantly it sets up a lot of questions about the yet-to-be grokked possibilities for avatar-mediated interaction.

BTW, even though the title is “Dating and Mating in Secondlife,” rest assured that there is nothing whatsoever in this video that I would deem to be offensive. It is simply an enlightening conversation between the researchers/journalists where they very discuss their findings.

Too tired now to figure out how embed this particular video into my page.

Just click here and then click on video. It is only one additional click…go ahead click….one more time…..click…now that was not so bad was it? ; )

Web 2.0 and Personal Learning Environments (PLEs)

Filed under: Annual Gathering, Jay Cross, PLE, Steven Downes, e-Learning Guild — wadatripp @ 10:09 pm

Crazy week this week. First I was sick as a dog with some crazy bug where I could hang on during the day but at night I would get this killer sore throat that kept me up all night in bad pain. That would be OK except that this week I had to be in NY and Boston all in the one week.

Anyway enough about me and my woes. Onto the good stuff….

I was fortunate enough to be asked to contribute at the e-Learning Guild in two different forums this week:

null

Tony Karrer, hoodwinked Brent Schelenker, Steven Downes and yours truly to talk about Web 2.0 (and a bit of 3D) meets Corporate Learning — or if that is not what it was he wanted us to talk about it is certainly where it went.

I’ve known Tony for a while….and I am a big fan of both Steven and Brent’s via daily reading of their Blogs. I think because of this, we were kinda able to get right into it and riff because we each knew where each other stood and we got to take the conversation into the generative learning and co-creation stage very quickly.

This is also one of the coolest things about Web 2.0 that we talked about on the panel. First and foremost Steven made the point that your approach as an educator should not be “OK let me figure out what blogs, wikis, social tagging, You Tube, Second Life and Moodle mean for my learning strategy or my learners.” Instead Steven suggests you start in the most obvious place…Where might that be? you ask…Why YOU and your own learning of course Steven says.

Time is on the same channel here:

First, get an account on blogger and start to converse publically. This is step one in what Steven calls your Personal Learning Environment (PLE). BTW Jay Cross is on a similar trip here and both Steven and Jay acknowledge they have not Grokked the solution but they are equally passionate about the idea.

We then got into….once you start with a blog, (Hello WordPress/Blogger) your learning starts to take off. You start to get motivated to want to find a tool that helps make your space more conversational and co-creative/crowsourced in terms of production/interpretation of content/ideas (Hello Wiki). You then want to throw in some pictures (Hello Flickr/OFoto) and inevitibely want to find (or create) audio (Hello Odeo) and video (Hello Jumpcut, Eyespot and YouTube/Google Video) that further emphasize your point. You then want to take all these different piece parts together into a single place that is just for you (Hello MySpace….oh that is so yesterday why not build it out in 3D in Secondlife)…and suddenly you start to understand that we have finally tipped on a number of fronts:

    Web services meets Web 2.0 which means that it becomes easier for people (not just programmers to be prosumers)
    Centrally Created Content/Control moves towards User Generated Content/Sharing
    Content is king but Context is the Kingdom
    Power on all levels is moving towards the consumer (kinda like banks with ATMs only about everything) but consumers are also becoming producers.
    Consumption moves towards Prosumption

In double-looping on this I ponder….Is it just me or did you notice that either Google or Yahoo is snapping everything up this food chain. So Rupert did interrupt the cycle and Cisco did Buy WEBEX…but how ’bout the 3D space. If you think about it 2D interactive platforms that have aggregated eyeballs (either Myspace in the Consumer space or Webex in the Corporate space) are, IMHO, all going to end up in the 3D space. All you gotta do is look at what is going on in Korea with CyWorld to see that. And Korea is the place to look to as they are the leading adopters in this space as it was with DoCoMo in mobile many years ago in Japan.

Anyway enough about that. Those of you who are either digital natives and just do this or digital immigrants like me who work like the dickens to live/learn/work this way know that the learning (and responsibility to contribute..which is why I am sitting here exhausted on a Friday night but feeling the need to share) is so poweful that it literally changes the game.

Keep a watch on Jay and Steven to see where they go next on PLEs…it is good stuff.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.